000 | 02678nam a22004455i 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 978-1-59745-295-3 | ||
003 | DE-He213 | ||
005 | 20161121230737.0 | ||
007 | cr nn 008mamaa | ||
008 | 100301s2007 xxu| s |||| 0|eng d | ||
020 |
_a9781597452953 _9978-1-59745-295-3 |
||
024 | 7 |
_a10.1007/978-1-59745-295-3 _2doi |
|
050 | 4 | _aQH332 | |
050 | 4 | _aR724-726.2 | |
072 | 7 |
_aPSAD _2bicssc |
|
072 | 7 |
_aMB _2bicssc |
|
072 | 7 |
_aMED050000 _2bisacsh |
|
082 | 0 | 4 |
_a610.1 _223 |
082 | 0 | 4 |
_a174.2 _223 |
100 | 1 |
_aSpielman, Bethany J. _eauthor. |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aBioethics in Law _h[electronic resource] / _cby Bethany J. Spielman. |
264 | 1 |
_aTotowa, NJ : _bHumana Press, _c2007. |
|
300 |
_a186 p. _bonline resource. |
||
336 |
_atext _btxt _2rdacontent |
||
337 |
_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia |
||
338 |
_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier |
||
347 |
_atext file _bPDF _2rda |
||
505 | 0 | _aHow Does Bioethics Help Judicial Reasoning? -- Health Care Ethics Committee Determinations -- Institutional Review Board Determinations -- Bioethics Commission Reports -- Bioethics Scholarship -- Reliability of Bioethics Testimony -- Reliability of Bioethics Testimony -- Reliability of Bioethics Testimony -- Conclusion. | |
520 | _aThe idea for Bioethics in Law began more than a decade ago, while I was studying social science and law. I was parti- larly interested in the collaborations that comprised social s- ence in law. Economic and social data in the pioneering Brandeis brief had been used to defend an early 20th-century labor law; surveys of consumer confusion had helped resolve trademark - fringement cases; psychologists’ predictions of future violence had informed capital sentencing decisions. Additionally, Kenneth Clark’s “doll studies,” cited by the Supreme Court in Brown v. Board of Education, had helped change the course of American 1 history. During that time, however, I was most intensely interested in bioethics, a relatively young field whose relationships to law had not been well analyzed. I wondered whether there could or should be a bioethics in law, because bioethics, unlike the social sciences, was not only in its infancy, but also had distinctly normative features, which might not mesh easily with law’s own normativity. | ||
650 | 0 | _aMedicine. | |
650 | 0 | _aMedical ethics. | |
650 | 1 | 4 | _aMedicine & Public Health. |
650 | 2 | 4 | _aTheory of Medicine/Bioethics. |
710 | 2 | _aSpringerLink (Online service) | |
773 | 0 | _tSpringer eBooks | |
776 | 0 | 8 |
_iPrinted edition: _z9781588294340 |
856 | 4 | 0 | _uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-295-3 |
912 | _aZDB-2-SME | ||
950 | _aMedicine (Springer-11650) | ||
999 |
_c503318 _d503318 |