Accountability for International Humanitarian Law Violations: The Case of Rwanda and East Timor
By: Othman, Mohamed C [author.].
Contributor(s): S.
Material type:
BookPublisher: Berlin, Heidelberg : Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2005.Description: XIV, 384 p. online resource.Content type: text Media type: computer Carrier type: online resourceISBN: 9783540288855.Subject(s): C | I | I | L | C | I | I | SDDC classification: 345 Online resources: Click here to access online | Item type | Current location | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode | Item holds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PK Kelkar Library, IIT Kanpur | Available | EBKS0001989 |
Rwanda and East Timor: Pattern of Violence -- Accountability Arrangements: Rwanda -- Accountability Arrangements: East Timor -- Profiling Perpetrators -- Conspiracy to commit genocide -- Superior Responsibility -- Guilty Pleas -- Conclusion.
The main objective of this book is to make available to an informed audience a le� gal and policy oriented study on accountability for serious human rights and inter� national humanitarian law violations. It is an attempt to share the lessons learnt in accountability for atrocity crimes as conducted by the International Criminal Tri� bunal for Rwanda (ICTR), and the United Nations Transitional Administration in East Timor (UNTAET). The former established subsequent to egregious atrocities that took place in 1994, and the latter following the massive outburst of violence in 1999. The book is based on two cases: Rwanda and East Timor. It is expected that it will serve as reference literature to both the legal community and policy makers on accountability for heinous international crimes. As the international community and States, following serious human rights and international humanitarian law violations have painfully come to terms with their obligations to bring to justice persons in high offices or leadership positions, de jure or de facto, alleged to have committed such crimes, it has also become im� perative that beginners mistakes be avoided. When the International Criminal Tri� bunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY) was established in 1993, and the ICTR in 1994 and commenced their pioneering mandates there was no template on which the prosecution of individuals most responsible or with the greatest responsibility could be cast. Accountability had to be experimental. 0 L
There are no comments for this item.