Welcome to P K Kelkar Library, Online Public Access Catalogue (OPAC)

Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Semantic similarity from natural language and ontology analysis /

By: Harispe, Sébastien [author.].
Contributor(s): Ranwez, Sylvie [author.] | Janaqi, Stefan [author.] | Montmain, Jacky [author.].
Material type: materialTypeLabelBookSeries: Synthesis digital library of engineering and computer science: ; Synthesis lectures on human language technologies: # 27.Publisher: San Rafael, California (1537 Fourth Street, San Rafael, CA 94901 USA) : Morgan & Claypool, 2015.Description: 1 PDF (xv, 238 pages) : illustrations.Content type: text Media type: electronic Carrier type: online resourceISBN: 9781627054478.Subject(s): Natural language processing (Computer science) | Semantic computing | semantic similarity | semantic relatedness | semantic measures | distributional measures | domain ontology | knowledge-based semantic measureDDC classification: 006.35 Online resources: Abstract with links to resource Also available in print.
Contents:
2. Corpus-based semantic measures -- 2.1 From text analysis to semantic measures -- 2.2 Semantic evidence of word similarity in natural language -- 2.2.1 The meaning of words -- 2.2.2 Structural relationships: paradigmatic and syntagmatic -- 2.2.3 The notion of context -- 2.2.4 Distributional semantics -- 2.3 Distributional measures -- 2.3.1 Implementation of the distributional hypothesis -- 2.3.2 From distributional model to word similarity -- 2.3.3 Capturing deeper co-occurrences -- 2.4 Other corpus-based measures -- 2.5 Advantages and limits of corpus-based measures -- 2.5.1 Advantages of corpus-based measures -- 2.5.2 Limits of corpus-based measures -- 2.6 Conclusion --
1. Introduction to semantic measures -- 1.1 Semantic measures in action -- 1.1.1 Natural language processing -- 1.1.2 Knowledge engineering, semantic web, and linked data -- 1.1.3 Biomedical informatics and bioinformatics -- 1.1.4 Other applications -- 1.2 From similarity toward semantic measures -- 1.2.1 Human cognition, similarity, and existing models -- 1.2.2 Definitions of semantic measures and related vocabulary -- 1.2.3 From distance and similarities to semantic measures -- 1.3 Classification of semantic measures -- 1.3.1 How to classify semantic measures -- 1.3.2 A general classification of semantic measures --
3. Knowledge-based semantic measures -- 3.1 Ontologies as graphs and formal notations -- 3.1.1 Ontologies as graphs -- 3.1.2 Relationships -- 3.1.3 Graph traversals -- 3.1.4 Notations for taxonomies -- 3.2 Types of semantic measures and graph properties -- 3.2.1 Semantic measures on cyclic semantic graphs -- 3.2.2 Semantic measures on acyclic graphs -- 3.3 Semantic evidence in semantic graphs and their interpretations -- 3.3.1 Semantic evidence in taxonomies -- 3.3.2 Concept specificity -- 3.3.3 Strength of connotations between concepts -- 3.4 Semantic similarity between a pair of concepts -- 3.4.1 Structural approach -- 3.4.2 Feature-based approach -- 3.4.3 Information theoretical approach -- 3.4.4 Hybrid approach -- 3.4.5 Considerations when comparing concepts in semantic graphs -- 3.4.6 List of pairwise semantic similarity measures -- 3.5 Semantic similarity between groups of concepts -- 3.5.1 Direct approach -- 3.5.2 Indirect approach -- 3.5.3 List of groupwise semantic similarity measures -- 3.6 Other knowledge-based measures -- 3.6.1 Semantic measures based on logic-based semantics -- 3.6.2 Semantic measures for multiple ontologies -- 3.7 Advantages and limits of knowledge-based measures -- 3.8 Mixing knowledge-based and corpus-based approaches -- 3.8.1 Generalities -- 3.8.2 Wikipedia-based measure: how to benefit from structured encyclopedia knowledge -- 3.9 Conclusion --
4. Methods and datasets for the evaluation of semantic measures -- 4.1 A general introduction to semantic measure evaluation -- 4.2 Criteria for semantic measure evaluation -- 4.2.1 Accuracy, precision, and robustness -- 4.2.2 Computational complexity -- 4.2.3 Mathematical properties -- 4.2.4 Semantics -- 4.2.5 Technical details -- 4.3 Existing protocols and datasets -- 4.3.1 Protocols used to compare measures -- 4.3.2 Datasets -- 4.4 Discussions --
5. Conclusion and research directions -- A. Examples of syntagmatic contexts -- B. A brief introduction to singular value decomposition -- C. A brief overview of other models for representing units of language -- D. Software tools and source code libraries -- Bibliography -- Authors' biographies.
Abstract: Artificial Intelligence federates numerous scientific fields in the aim of developing machines able to assist human operators performing complex treatments.most of which demand high cognitive skills (e.g. learning or decision processes). Central to this quest is to give machines the ability to estimate the likeness or similarity between things in the way human beings estimate the similarity between stimuli. In this context, this book focuses on semantic measures: approaches designed for comparing semantic entities such as units of language, e.g. words, sentences, or concepts and instances defined into knowledge bases. The aim of these measures is to assess the similarity or relatedness of such semantic entities by taking into account their semantics, i.e. their meaning.intuitively, the words tea and coffee, which both refer to stimulating beverage, will be estimated to be more semantically similar than the words toffee (confection) and coffee, despite that the last pair has a higher syntactic similarity. The two state-of-the-art approaches for estimating and quantifying semantic similarities/relatedness of semantic entities are presented in detail: the first one relies on corpora analysis and is based on Natural Language Processing techniques and semantic models while the second is based on more or less formal, computer-readable and workable forms of knowledge such as semantic networks, thesauri or ontologies. Semantic measures are widely used today to compare units of language, concepts, instances or even resources indexed by them (e.g., documents, genes). They are central elements of a large variety of Natural Language Processing applications and knowledge-based treatments, and have therefore naturally been subject to intensive and interdisciplinary research efforts during last decades. Beyond a simple inventory and categorization of existing measures, the aim of this monograph is to convey novices as well as researchers of these domains toward a better understanding of semantic similarity estimation and more generally semantic measures. To this end, we propose an in-depth characterization of existing proposals by discussing their features, the assumptions on which they are based and empirical results regarding their performance in particular applications. By answering these questions and by providing a detailed discussion on the foundations of semantic measures, our aim is to give the reader key knowledge required to: (i) select the more relevant methods according to a particular usage context, (ii) understand the challenges offered to this field of study, (iii) distinguish room of improvements for state-of-the-art approaches and (iv) stimulate creativity toward the development of new approaches. In this aim, several definitions, theoretical and practical details, as well as concrete applications are presented.
    average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Item type Current location Call number Status Date due Barcode Item holds
E books E books PK Kelkar Library, IIT Kanpur
Available EBKE639
Total holds: 0

Mode of access: World Wide Web.

System requirements: Adobe Acrobat Reader.

Part of: Synthesis digital library of engineering and computer science.

Includes bibliographical references (pages 197-236).

2. Corpus-based semantic measures -- 2.1 From text analysis to semantic measures -- 2.2 Semantic evidence of word similarity in natural language -- 2.2.1 The meaning of words -- 2.2.2 Structural relationships: paradigmatic and syntagmatic -- 2.2.3 The notion of context -- 2.2.4 Distributional semantics -- 2.3 Distributional measures -- 2.3.1 Implementation of the distributional hypothesis -- 2.3.2 From distributional model to word similarity -- 2.3.3 Capturing deeper co-occurrences -- 2.4 Other corpus-based measures -- 2.5 Advantages and limits of corpus-based measures -- 2.5.1 Advantages of corpus-based measures -- 2.5.2 Limits of corpus-based measures -- 2.6 Conclusion --

1. Introduction to semantic measures -- 1.1 Semantic measures in action -- 1.1.1 Natural language processing -- 1.1.2 Knowledge engineering, semantic web, and linked data -- 1.1.3 Biomedical informatics and bioinformatics -- 1.1.4 Other applications -- 1.2 From similarity toward semantic measures -- 1.2.1 Human cognition, similarity, and existing models -- 1.2.2 Definitions of semantic measures and related vocabulary -- 1.2.3 From distance and similarities to semantic measures -- 1.3 Classification of semantic measures -- 1.3.1 How to classify semantic measures -- 1.3.2 A general classification of semantic measures --

3. Knowledge-based semantic measures -- 3.1 Ontologies as graphs and formal notations -- 3.1.1 Ontologies as graphs -- 3.1.2 Relationships -- 3.1.3 Graph traversals -- 3.1.4 Notations for taxonomies -- 3.2 Types of semantic measures and graph properties -- 3.2.1 Semantic measures on cyclic semantic graphs -- 3.2.2 Semantic measures on acyclic graphs -- 3.3 Semantic evidence in semantic graphs and their interpretations -- 3.3.1 Semantic evidence in taxonomies -- 3.3.2 Concept specificity -- 3.3.3 Strength of connotations between concepts -- 3.4 Semantic similarity between a pair of concepts -- 3.4.1 Structural approach -- 3.4.2 Feature-based approach -- 3.4.3 Information theoretical approach -- 3.4.4 Hybrid approach -- 3.4.5 Considerations when comparing concepts in semantic graphs -- 3.4.6 List of pairwise semantic similarity measures -- 3.5 Semantic similarity between groups of concepts -- 3.5.1 Direct approach -- 3.5.2 Indirect approach -- 3.5.3 List of groupwise semantic similarity measures -- 3.6 Other knowledge-based measures -- 3.6.1 Semantic measures based on logic-based semantics -- 3.6.2 Semantic measures for multiple ontologies -- 3.7 Advantages and limits of knowledge-based measures -- 3.8 Mixing knowledge-based and corpus-based approaches -- 3.8.1 Generalities -- 3.8.2 Wikipedia-based measure: how to benefit from structured encyclopedia knowledge -- 3.9 Conclusion --

4. Methods and datasets for the evaluation of semantic measures -- 4.1 A general introduction to semantic measure evaluation -- 4.2 Criteria for semantic measure evaluation -- 4.2.1 Accuracy, precision, and robustness -- 4.2.2 Computational complexity -- 4.2.3 Mathematical properties -- 4.2.4 Semantics -- 4.2.5 Technical details -- 4.3 Existing protocols and datasets -- 4.3.1 Protocols used to compare measures -- 4.3.2 Datasets -- 4.4 Discussions --

5. Conclusion and research directions -- A. Examples of syntagmatic contexts -- B. A brief introduction to singular value decomposition -- C. A brief overview of other models for representing units of language -- D. Software tools and source code libraries -- Bibliography -- Authors' biographies.

Abstract freely available; full-text restricted to subscribers or individual document purchasers.

Compendex

INSPEC

Google scholar

Google book search

Artificial Intelligence federates numerous scientific fields in the aim of developing machines able to assist human operators performing complex treatments.most of which demand high cognitive skills (e.g. learning or decision processes). Central to this quest is to give machines the ability to estimate the likeness or similarity between things in the way human beings estimate the similarity between stimuli. In this context, this book focuses on semantic measures: approaches designed for comparing semantic entities such as units of language, e.g. words, sentences, or concepts and instances defined into knowledge bases. The aim of these measures is to assess the similarity or relatedness of such semantic entities by taking into account their semantics, i.e. their meaning.intuitively, the words tea and coffee, which both refer to stimulating beverage, will be estimated to be more semantically similar than the words toffee (confection) and coffee, despite that the last pair has a higher syntactic similarity. The two state-of-the-art approaches for estimating and quantifying semantic similarities/relatedness of semantic entities are presented in detail: the first one relies on corpora analysis and is based on Natural Language Processing techniques and semantic models while the second is based on more or less formal, computer-readable and workable forms of knowledge such as semantic networks, thesauri or ontologies. Semantic measures are widely used today to compare units of language, concepts, instances or even resources indexed by them (e.g., documents, genes). They are central elements of a large variety of Natural Language Processing applications and knowledge-based treatments, and have therefore naturally been subject to intensive and interdisciplinary research efforts during last decades. Beyond a simple inventory and categorization of existing measures, the aim of this monograph is to convey novices as well as researchers of these domains toward a better understanding of semantic similarity estimation and more generally semantic measures. To this end, we propose an in-depth characterization of existing proposals by discussing their features, the assumptions on which they are based and empirical results regarding their performance in particular applications. By answering these questions and by providing a detailed discussion on the foundations of semantic measures, our aim is to give the reader key knowledge required to: (i) select the more relevant methods according to a particular usage context, (ii) understand the challenges offered to this field of study, (iii) distinguish room of improvements for state-of-the-art approaches and (iv) stimulate creativity toward the development of new approaches. In this aim, several definitions, theoretical and practical details, as well as concrete applications are presented.

Also available in print.

Title from PDF title page (viewed on June 20, 2015).

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.

Powered by Koha